Have you ever rung someone and you could hear them, but they couldn’t hear you? How did you feel? Disappointed? Frustrated or surprised maybe, that the other side couldn’t participate in the conversation? Did you try to ring again in hope that this time you will be able to have ‘normal’ conversation?
Asking participants for feedback is a conversation between the brand and the customer. A conversation where both sides have an opportunity to share their thoughts and to ask questions. Very frequently however, market research is not run in this way, where both sides of the conversation are getting an equal amount of satisfaction from the other. The brand asks a lot of questions, participants answer them, and often that is that; nothing else happens. Whether it is a survey or a discussion within a focus group, participants often don’t find out what the overall findings are, how the brand will use the information they collected or what decisions the brand will make based on the study. So, in a way, participants have that a one-way conversation with the brand I mentioned earlier, where they can’t hear the brand on the other side.
Does it matter though? Is it important to go back to participants once they shared their feedback and tell them a bit about what it has helped with?
The short answer is yes. It is one of the best ways of recognising participants’ efforts and is one of the most effective aspects to increase engagement. It lets participants know that they have been heard, that their feedback matters and has been taken on-board. This reciprocity propels further engagement with the brand, by making participants feel more involved and have a real impact on the formation/evolution of the brand, which can therefore positively influence their overall opinion about the brand. The importance of this positive opinion cannot be overstated, as it is becoming more and more obvious that the opinion of one customer has an immense influence on the opinions of all the others.
Going back to participants and sharing a brand’s actions on their data requires precious time and resource, but it is worth making an effort, especially if:
After focussing on the benefits of reciprocity, one question remains - How do businesses do it? How do you update participants on the studies they have taken part in? Well, you have at least three options:
Reciprocity is definitely something worth thinking about and incorporating into you next research project. It’s one of those little extra touches that can have significant impact on the quality of your research and perception of the brand. Most importantly, it is a relatively simple action for the business to take that by far has more benefits than it does drawbacks.
What is your experience in this? Have you shared with participants how you used their feedback? Share your thoughts with me below.