Online market research communities (or MROCs) are closed networks of profiled, opted-in research participants who take part in structured and unstructured qualitative research tasks. Usually hosted over a long term basis, a research community is one key way brands stay close to their customers across multiple projects. The set up is ideal for listening to common themes and trends, whilst running a layer of stakeholder led insight projects on topics important to a brand.
Typically, an online market research community will consist of up to 500 a small number of customers, and have been operated on an invite only basis. However, as technology advances and the role of customer centricity has grown in importance, this dynamic is changing. Community panels have begun to emerge; combining the scale of a customer panel (which often hold between 10,000 – 100,000 participants) with the qualitative nature of an online community. Similarly, the closed nature of research communities is being challenged as firms seek to engage more with a broad range of customers.
At this point, it’s worth considering that there are broadly three types of market research community. Although each of these has a separate goal, they are not mutually exclusive and communities often span multiple objectives. They are:
Tweet This | |
The three types of online community - project, listening and pop-up - are not mutually exclusive and often the best communities are a hybrid of all. |
While the objectives of each of these communities may differ, the benefits remain the same. An online market research community is one of the most efficient, engaging ways to gain rich qualitative feedback whilst reducing the recruitment and incentive management overheads that are incurred from working on a project to project basis.
The most straightforward benefit of an online community is the simplification of recruitment, incentive management and participant quality control. Because communities are filled with pre-profiled participants, recruitment and incentives for individual qualitative projects are all handed within a single platform. In turn, this has a knock on effect on project management, efficiency and speed of insight – a real win-win.
It’s also easy to understate just how much of a benefit the flexible scale and scope of an online community is. With many platforms capable of running projects across multiple languages, geographies, brands and consumer segments: a community can grow with your brand and research needs.
The AQR notes that online communities are also able to gradually guide participants to more complex areas of discussion and topics than other, shorter term methodologies would allow. Similarly, communities encourage more reflective, in-depth insight as participants have more time to think about answers, responses and suggestions from other members.
Crucially, however, community platforms provide opportunities for participant to participant interaction that do not exist in project based structures. A well maintained community will not only provide insight on a per project basis – but, as customers create and share their own content, acting as a springboard for even deeper discussion.
And these benefits are clearly not lost on researchers. The Q3-Q4 Greenbook GRIT report found that 59% of respondents are already using this form of research methodology and a total of 80% are at the very least interested in them. This makes them the number #1 most adopted emerging research trend. Online communities even beat mobile first surveys in terms of popularity, used by 54% of respondents.
Tweet This | |
The Q3/Q4 Greenbook GRIT report found that 59% of respondents are using online communities, making them the most popular emerging research method, even over mobile first surveys. |
However, no methodology is perfect – and communities are not an exception. The common challenges that need to be overcome include: maintaining engagement levels over a long period of time, the possibility of group think to emerge, communities to become fractious or toxic, and the investment in content production to fill the time between projects.
Choosing the right supplier is a vital decision, and one that can have a significant impact on your success. There are a range of factors to consider; tool availability, recruitment methods, user experience, supporting services and, of course, return on investment.
Fortunately, most research platforms have a similar set of core features – such as a range of data collection methods, custom branding and data exports. However, here’s some questions you should consider during the platform selection process: